Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1102

reference
802-tree-1
name
1102
tree-preservation-order

undefined

802-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.010891 50.886336)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.010820 50.886329,-1.010823 50.886343,-1.010833 50.886355,-1.010848 50.886365,-1.010868 50.886372,-1.010890 50.886374,-1.010912 50.886372,-1.010932 50.886366,-1.010948 50.886356,-1.010958 50.886344,-1.010962 50.886330,-1.010959 50.886316,-1.010949 50.886303,-1.010933 50.886293,-1.010914 50.886287,-1.010892 50.886284,-1.010870 50.886286,-1.010850 50.886292,-1.010834 50.886302,-1.010824 50.886315,-1.010820 50.886329)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL